Skip to content Skip to navigation

Food System Shock - Lloyds Emerging Risk Report 2015

Garden Tiger Moth photographed by Gabor PozsgaiThis website has been mothballed.

It is no longer being updated but we've left it here for reference.

Further information

Food System Shock: The insurance impacts of acute disruption to global food security

This is a report produced by Lloyds based on a scenario exercise to investigate the consequences of a climate change extreme event. In this case, the event is a warm El Nino phase leading to reductions in key crops and the impact on global food prices and subsequent consequences based on political economic responses.

Type of Study

This is a scenario development exercise applied at the global scale, but considering key national level consequences and responses.

Objective of the study

To investigate the possible consequences of global scale disruption to the food system caused by climate change.

Location

The study is global in coverage, with the inclussion of specific impacts nad consequences in many countries.

Models used (and version)

This is a scenario exercise so does not use a specific model, but builds upon the work of IFPRI, AgMIP and other organisations and modelling initiatives.

The scenarios were developed based on expert opinion, with input from the Global Resource Observatory project based at Anglia Ruskin University, and the IMPACT model developed by IFPRI.

Did the model require context specific development /adaptation ?

Not applicable

Data used

The magnitude of the shock for each commodity is based on de-trended FAO data from 1961 to 2013.

There is uncertainty in the accuracy of global food stock data.

 

Who conducted the study?

 

The report is produced by Trevor Maynard, Head of Exposure Management at Lloyds.

The scenarios were prepared by a research team led by Aled Jones and Molly Jahn with significant contribution from Tobias Lunt. Assistance was provided by David LeZaks, William Mulhern and Carol Barford.
Expert consultation and review were provided by Stephen Baenziger, Catherine Cameron, Corey Cherr, Nancy DeVore, Kenneth Donaldson, Joshua Elliott, Charles Godfray, Maryam Golnaraghi, Jonathan Hellin, Marc Levy, Tom Lumpkin, Niall Moten,
Michael Obersteiner, Sherman Robinson, David Robson, Mark Rosegrant, J. Shukla, Jerry Skees, Keith Wiebe, Don Wuebbles, the International Food Policy Research Institute’s Global Futures and Strategic Foresight Program for IMPACT model runs, members of the UK/US Task Force on Resilience of the Global Food Supply Chain to Extreme Events supported by the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, and the Knowledge Systems for Sustainability Collaborative’s Multiple Breadbasket Failure Initiative.

Results

Key findings and conclusions

The following are extracts from the Lloyds report:

  • The ability of the global food system to achieve food security is under significant pressure.
  • There is a pressing need to reduce the uncertainty surrounding the impacts of an extreme shock to the food supply.
  • Lloyd’s commissioned the development of a scenario of extreme shock to global food production in order to explore the implications for insurance and risk.
  • The systemic production shock to the world’s staple food crops described in the scenario generates widespread economic, political and social impacts.
  • The insurance industry is in a position to make an important contribution to improving the resilience and sustainability of the global food system.
  • Scenarios are an important method of exploring emerging risks; they are not predictions or forecasts.

Discussion

What was learned from conducting the study?

A key conclusion is the recognition of the knock-on consequences of an extreme climatic event on the food system and its subsequent impact on a wide range of economic and political activities.

How could the study have been improved?

More accurate data on food stocks etc.

Parameter values

Parameter values used in the model

Not applicable

Discussion

This looks like an interesting piece of research, and is similar to one about to be published by the UK Global Food Security Programme.